← Back to Verdikt

Acura RDX vs Mazda CX-5

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
It's close — Acura RDX (6.7) and Mazda CX-5 (6.8) score nearly the same. Pick on the trade-offs that matter to you.
Dimension by dimension
 Acura RDXMazda CX-5
Reliability & Durability 6.0 8.6
User Sentiment 5.8 3.5
Complaint Severity 6.4 8.6
Consensus Strength 3.0 2.2
Value for Money 6.0 4.7
Owner Advocacy 8.5 8.4
Acura RDX

The RDX is Acura's best attempt at a driver's SUV, the SH-AWD torque vectoring really does make it corner like a sedan, and the cabin feels genuinely luxurious for the money. But the third-gen 2.0T drinks gas like a V6 (20-22 MPG in the real world), the 2019-2024 models have a rear glass shattering problem that keeps coming back even after the TSB fix, and the 2025s suffered complete power steering failures at low speeds, now under recall. If you want the handling and can live with the fuel bill, a 2022-2024 makes sense; skip the 2025 until the recall work proves durable, and know that Acura is killing the line in 2026 with no replacement for two years.

Mazda CX-5

Mazda built a compact crossover that drives like a sport sedan and lasts like a Toyota, then fumbled the 2026 redesign by burying climate controls in a touchscreen. The 2017-2025 generation is the sweet spot: upscale interior, engaging handling, and owners routinely hitting 200k+ miles with nothing but oil changes. The rotary dial infotainment that reviewers love actually works once you learn it. But the new model ditches those physical controls just as competitors are bringing them back, and the community is furious. Shopping used or hunting a leftover 2025? You're golden. Eyeing the 2026? You're the guinea pig for Mazda's cost-cutting experiment, and early sentiment suggests they read the room wrong. Buy the outgoing model while you still can.