← Back to Verdikt

Amana NTW4519 Top Load Washer vs LG WT7305 Top Load Washer

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
LG WT7305 Top Load Washer comes out ahead overall (5.8 vs 5.2), but the breakdown below shows where each one wins.
Dimension by dimension
 Amana NTW4519 Top Load WasherLG WT7305 Top Load Washer
Reliability & Durability 3.3 5.0
User Sentiment 6.9 6.3
Complaint Severity 6.2 7.3
Consensus Strength 1.1 3.1
Value for Money 4.5 2.3
Owner Advocacy 4.0 6.0
Amana NTW4519 Top Load Washer

This sub-$700 Whirlpool-built basic washer ships with a documented control board defect: the water level sensor fails and locks the drain pump into continuous operation, sometimes starting itself in the middle of the night to run empty. The $225 board replacement plus labor costs more than buying a used machine, and the failure hits reliably at 12-18 months, confirmed by techs as a known service bulletin issue. Even if you dodge that sensor lottery, the auto-sensing chronically underfills, leaving clothes half-dry during wash. Save another $200 for a machine without a systematic failure mode baked into the design.

LG WT7305 Top Load Washer

This is LG's attempt to split the difference between old-school agitator washers and modern smart features, and it mostly works until it doesn't. The 4.8 cubic foot tub swallows king comforters, the agitator scrubs like the machines your parents remember, and TurboWash3D cuts cycle times, but control boards and spin bearings fail on 2-3 year old units with alarming regularity, then you wait weeks for LG warranty service to show up with parts that may not be in stock. Some owners hit a decade of trouble-free service; others face a torn agitator fin or dead inlet valve before the third anniversary. Buy it if you need the capacity and refuse to trust an impeller, but budget for repairs and accept that this isn't the indestructible tank from 1987.