← Back to Verdikt

Chevrolet Traverse vs Nissan Murano

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
It's close — Chevrolet Traverse (5.8) and Nissan Murano (5.7) score nearly the same. Pick on the trade-offs that matter to you.
Dimension by dimension
 Chevrolet TraverseNissan Murano
Reliability & Durability 5.0 4.0
User Sentiment 6.6 5.8
Complaint Severity 7.4 6.8
Consensus Strength 1.2 2.2
Value for Money 4.3 4.6
Owner Advocacy 5.0 6.5
Chevrolet Traverse

The Traverse is GM's maximum-space-for-minimum-money play, genuinely the roomiest three-row at this price, with a third row adults don't hate. The catch: pre-2024 models earned a brutal reputation for 9-speed transmissions that slip and fail between 40k and 60k miles, a pattern too consistent to ignore, while the 2024 redesign's turbo-4 is already drawing early complaints about powertrain and electrical issues in its first year. If you need cavernous space on a budget and plan to trade before 100k, it delivers; if you're keeping it long-term, the Pilot and Highlander cost more for a reason.

Nissan Murano

Nissan's plush two-row crossover rides like a luxury SUV but carries a ticking time bomb under the hood: the CVT transmission grenades itself between 60k-120k miles with alarming regularity, even when religiously maintained. The 2015-2024 models charm owners with their V6 power and living-room comfort until that $4k-8k replacement bill arrives. The all-new 2025 ditched the V6 for a turbo-4 nobody wanted, added buggy tech, and promptly sat unsold on dealer lots with massive incentives. If you're buying used, budget for a CVT replacement as a when-not-if expense. If you're considering the redesign, you're beta-testing Nissan's desperation play. Skip this unless you're leasing short-term or love gambling on transmissions.