← Back to Verdikt

GE GFW655 Front Load Washer vs LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer comes out ahead overall (6.9 vs 3.2), but the breakdown below shows where each one wins.
Dimension by dimension
 GE GFW655 Front Load WasherLG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer
Reliability & Durability 2.7 6.7
User Sentiment 3.5 6.5
Complaint Severity 6.6 6.9
Consensus Strength 1.0 3.0
Value for Money 1.9 4.8
Owner Advocacy 1.4 8.1
GE GFW655 Front Load Washer

GE built a front-loader with genuinely clever features, auto-dosing that actually works, a vent system that fights mold better than most, then strapped them to electronics that fail like clockwork. Inverter boards die at two to three years and frequently take the main control board with them, turning a $160 part into a $450 repair once you pay labor. Some three or four board replacements in the first few years, and GE's ten-year motor warranty covers parts only, leaving you with the $250-300 technician bill every time. Skip this unless you're getting a steep discount and extended labor coverage, or you enjoy maintaining a relationship with your appliance repair guy.

LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer

This midrange front loader delivers genuinely useful features: TurboWash cuts cycle times, EzDispense means refilling detergent monthly instead of per load, and the 4.5 cu ft drum handles king-size comforters without complaint. When bearings or the spider arm eventually wear out, typically 8-12 years in, the sealed tub design forces a $500-600 assembly replacement instead of a $200 parts swap that older LG models allowed. If you clean gaskets religiously, leave the door cracked, and don't plan to keep this past a decade, it's a smart buy at the right price; if you want a washer you can repair indefinitely, look elsewhere.