If you need three rows without Tahoe money, the current Acadia delivers space and features at a competitive price, but you're buying into a nameplate with serious baggage. The 2010-2016 models earned their terrible reputation with timing chain grenades and transmission failures before 100k, while the 2017+ redesign is genuinely improved, especially the 2020+ turbo-4 versions most owners find solid. The catch: that turbo-4 sounds like it's working overtime to haul this thing around, droning loudly enough in the cabin that multiple owners specifically mention it, and nobody knows yet if it'll hold up long-term under that load. The newest generation also inherits recurring thermostat and electrical module issues that plague all Acadias. Buy current if you need the space and can live with the noise, but skip anything pre-2017 unless you enjoy surprise service appointments.
Mazda built this two-row SUV to deliver luxury materials and a punchy inline-six at thousands below German pricing, but the brand-new platform wasn't ready for showrooms. Rear brakes squeal so persistently that Mazda extended the warranty and redesigned the pads, yet parts remain backordered six months out. Radiators crack at 17,000 miles. Rattles infiltrate the cabin after 20,000. MotorTrend's yearlong tester called it one of their worst long-term vehicles, citing quality lapses that shouldn't exist at $50,000. The CX-90 costs the same, adds a third row, and shares these same problems. If you want Mazda's excellent driving feel without the early-adopter tax, wait for the second model year or choose the CX-50 Hybrid, which uses Toyota's proven powertrain instead of this troubled architecture. Skip this one unless steep discounts compensate for likely warranty visits.