← Back to Verdikt

LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer vs LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer comes out ahead overall (6.9 vs 6.1), but the breakdown below shows where each one wins.
Dimension by dimension
 WM4000HWA Front Load WasherWM5700HVA Front Load Washer
Reliability & Durability 5.0 6.7
User Sentiment 5.0 6.5
Complaint Severity 8.0 6.9
Consensus Strength 5.0 3.0
Value for Money 5.5 4.8
Owner Advocacy 5.0 8.1
LG WM4000HWA Front Load Washer

This 4.5-cubic-foot mid-ranger sits in LG's lineup with zero owner feedback to tell you what actually happens after delivery. The spec sheet looks fine, but we have no way to confirm whether this specific model has a gasket that traps water, a dispenser that clogs, or a drum that outlasts the warranty by a decade. If you need a washer today and trust LG's general front-load reputation, buy it knowing you're the beta tester. If you can wait, let someone else go first and report back.

LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer

This midrange front loader delivers genuinely useful features: TurboWash cuts cycle times, EzDispense means refilling detergent monthly instead of per load, and the 4.5 cu ft drum handles king-size comforters without complaint. When bearings or the spider arm eventually wear out, typically 8-12 years in, the sealed tub design forces a $500-600 assembly replacement instead of a $200 parts swap that older LG models allowed. If you clean gaskets religiously, leave the door cracked, and don't plan to keep this past a decade, it's a smart buy at the right price; if you want a washer you can repair indefinitely, look elsewhere.