← Back to Verdikt

LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer vs LG WM6700HBA Front Load Washer

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
LG WM6700HBA Front Load Washer comes out ahead overall (7.3 vs 6.9), but the breakdown below shows where each one wins.
Dimension by dimension
 WM5700HVA Front Load WasherWM6700HBA Front Load Washer
Reliability & Durability 6.7 7.3
User Sentiment 6.5 7.3
Complaint Severity 6.9 7.4
Consensus Strength 3.0 2.6
Value for Money 4.8 4.8
Owner Advocacy 8.1 8.7
LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer

This midrange front loader delivers genuinely useful features: TurboWash cuts cycle times, EzDispense means refilling detergent monthly instead of per load, and the 4.5 cu ft drum handles king-size comforters without complaint. When bearings or the spider arm eventually wear out, typically 8-12 years in, the sealed tub design forces a $500-600 assembly replacement instead of a $200 parts swap that older LG models allowed. If you clean gaskets religiously, leave the door cracked, and don't plan to keep this past a decade, it's a smart buy at the right price; if you want a washer you can repair indefinitely, look elsewhere.

LG WM6700HBA Front Load Washer

LG's front loaders routinely run 12-19 years with minimal repairs, and this black steel flagship inherits that bulletproof direct-drive motor and easy serviceability. The odd catch: climbing to this trim level strips out the basic soak cycle cheaper models include, the auto-dispense softener compartment leaks if you use vinegar, and a few chemically sensitive owners couldn't shake the new-machine off-gassing smell even after multiple hot washes. Buy if you want a quiet, decade-plus workhorse and can live without a few conveniences; skip if you need every feature to work intuitively or have scent sensitivities, the mid-range 4000 series gives you most of the durability for less money and fewer quirks.