← Back to Verdikt

LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer vs LG WT7900HBA Top Load Washer

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
LG WT7900HBA Top Load Washer comes out ahead overall (7.4 vs 6.9), but the breakdown below shows where each one wins.
Dimension by dimension
 WM5700HVA Front Load WasherWT7900HBA Top Load Washer
Reliability & Durability 6.7 6.7
User Sentiment 6.5 9.3
Complaint Severity 6.9 7.5
Consensus Strength 3.0 3.1
Value for Money 4.8 2.9
Owner Advocacy 8.1 8.5
LG WM5700HVA Front Load Washer

This midrange front loader delivers genuinely useful features: TurboWash cuts cycle times, EzDispense means refilling detergent monthly instead of per load, and the 4.5 cu ft drum handles king-size comforters without complaint. When bearings or the spider arm eventually wear out, typically 8-12 years in, the sealed tub design forces a $500-600 assembly replacement instead of a $200 parts swap that older LG models allowed. If you clean gaskets religiously, leave the door cracked, and don't plan to keep this past a decade, it's a smart buy at the right price; if you want a washer you can repair indefinitely, look elsewhere.

LG WT7900HBA Top Load Washer

This is LG's attempt to make a top-loader feel modern, huge 5.5 cu. Ft. Tub, 29-minute TurboWash cycles, smart alerts, but it can't escape the physics problem all impeller washers share: clothes float above the waterline on heavy loads and come out half-cleaned. You'll burn extra rinse cycles chasing detergent residue off dark clothing, and the agitator fins tear within two years even under light use. Buy it if you need top-loading convenience and can live with mediocre cleaning on work jeans or gym clothes; skip it if a front-loader fits your laundry room, because one at this price will simply wash better.