Mazda built this two-row SUV to deliver luxury materials and a punchy inline-six at thousands below German pricing, but the brand-new platform wasn't ready for showrooms. Rear brakes squeal so persistently that Mazda extended the warranty and redesigned the pads, yet parts remain backordered six months out. Radiators crack at 17,000 miles. Rattles infiltrate the cabin after 20,000. MotorTrend's yearlong tester called it one of their worst long-term vehicles, citing quality lapses that shouldn't exist at $50,000. The CX-90 costs the same, adds a third row, and shares these same problems. If you want Mazda's excellent driving feel without the early-adopter tax, wait for the second model year or choose the CX-50 Hybrid, which uses Toyota's proven powertrain instead of this troubled architecture. Skip this one unless steep discounts compensate for likely warranty visits.
The RAV4 is the sensible choice that everyone makes and nobody regrets, proven reliability, hybrid efficiency that actually works, and resale value that borders on absurd. The catch is you're paying luxury money for economy-grade materials and putting up with dealer markups that would make a used-car lot blush, while the 2026's overeager safety tech yanks the wheel and slams the brakes at ghosts. Buy it if you want a vehicle that'll outlive your mortgage and you can negotiate a fair price; skip it if you expect $50k to feel like $50k inside, or if the CR-V's refinement matters more than Toyota's bulletproof reputation.