← Back to Verdikt

Buick Enclave vs Mazda CX-90

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
Mazda CX-90 comes out ahead overall (7.2 vs 5.0), but the breakdown below shows where each one wins.
Dimension by dimension
 Buick EnclaveMazda CX-90
Reliability & Durability 4.0 4.0
User Sentiment 3.9 8.7
Complaint Severity 6.6 7.5
Consensus Strength 1.9 4.9
Value for Money 4.3 6.6
Owner Advocacy 5.1 7.6
Buick Enclave

A plush three-row that trades on deep discounts and a hushed cabin, but the 2018-2024 generation carries a documented transfer case weakness. Multiple owners report the same failure: the case splits catastrophically at highway speed, dumping fluid and stranding the vehicle, sometimes with only 30k-70k miles on the clock. When it works, you get adult-sized third-row space, a genuinely quiet ride, and dealer incentives that undercut Honda and Toyota by thousands. The catch is you're rolling dice on a known mechanical fault, and mismatched tires accelerate the failure. The all-new 2025 redesign swaps the V6 for a turbo four and starts fresh on a new platform, so the old gremlins shouldn't follow, but there's zero long-term proof yet. Buy used and you're gambling; buy new and you're hoping Buick learned its lesson.

Mazda CX-90

Mazda built a $50k SUV that drives like it costs $70k, sharp handling, a silky inline-6, and an interior that embarrasses the Highlander, but shipped it before the transmission learned its lines. The 8-speed shudders and hesitates at low speeds across enough reports to call it systematic, not a lemon-lottery issue, and early PHEVs needed steering racks and 12V batteries replaced under warranty. If you prize driving feel over appliance-smooth operation and can live with first-year quirks (2026s show real improvement), the CX-90 delivers shocking value; if you need bulletproof out-of-the-gate execution, wait a year or stick with the boring-but-reliable competition.