← Back to Verdikt

Hyundai Palisade vs Mazda CX-90

Honest head-to-head from real owner consensus
It's close — Hyundai Palisade (7.1) and Mazda CX-90 (7.2) score nearly the same. Pick on the trade-offs that matter to you.
Dimension by dimension
 Hyundai PalisadeMazda CX-90
Reliability & Durability 6.0 4.0
User Sentiment 6.7 8.7
Complaint Severity 7.1 7.5
Consensus Strength 5.2 4.9
Value for Money 6.1 6.6
Owner Advocacy 7.7 7.6
Hyundai Palisade

Hyundai built this three-row to compete with luxury nameplates at half the sticker, quilted Calligraphy leather, 360 cameras, and semi-autonomous highway driving for $50k instead of $70k, and the 2023-2025 models mostly deliver on that promise. The 2026 redesign, though, hit a wall: a power-folding seat crushed a child to death in Ohio, triggering a 68,500-unit recall and stop-sale, while owners report dead batteries from digital key drain and wiring harness failures. The interior still impresses, the space is genuinely useful across all three rows, and the warranty cushions the gamble. But if you're buying new, you're debugging Hyundai's first swing at this generation. If you're buying used, stick to 2023-2025 and budget for a dealership experience that'll make you miss the DMV.

Mazda CX-90

Mazda built a $50k SUV that drives like it costs $70k, sharp handling, a silky inline-6, and an interior that embarrasses the Highlander, but shipped it before the transmission learned its lines. The 8-speed shudders and hesitates at low speeds across enough reports to call it systematic, not a lemon-lottery issue, and early PHEVs needed steering racks and 12V batteries replaced under warranty. If you prize driving feel over appliance-smooth operation and can live with first-year quirks (2026s show real improvement), the CX-90 delivers shocking value; if you need bulletproof out-of-the-gate execution, wait a year or stick with the boring-but-reliable competition.