← Back to Verdikt 
▼ ▼
Subcompact Crossover SUV
Kia Soul
⚠ Caution
Mixed signals, know the tradeoffs
⚠ Elevated risk
Primary risk is generation-specific: 2015-2020 models with 1.6L or 2.0L GDI engines show systematic piston ring failure leading to excessive oil consumption (1 quart per 1,000-2,000 miles) and catastrophic engine seizure, typically between 60k-120k miles. Multiple independent owners report identical failure pattern, often with no warning light. Kia extended warranties and replaced engines under class action settlement.
If you're eyeing a used Soul between 2015 and 2020, understand you're gambling on a ticking clock. Those model years, especially automatics with the 1.6L or 2.0L GDI engines, burn oil like it's their job, thanks to piston rings that fail predictably around 80k miles. Owners report topping off a quart every thousand miles, then one day the engine seizes with no warning light. Kia settled a class action over it and replaced thousands of engines, which tells you everything. The first-gen Souls (2010-2013) ran to 200k+ without drama, and the 2023+ models seem cleaner, but there's not enough road time to confirm the fix. What the Soul does well, maximum cargo in a tiny footprint, quirky looks, easy city parking, it does better than almost anything this size. Just make sure the one you're buying isn't someone else's oil-burning problem waiting to become yours.
The generation that matters
This product isn't one story — here's how each era is regarded.
1st generation (2010–2013)
2010–2013
Strong
Original AM generation praised for personality and value. One owner reports 250k miles on a 2011 model, another had theirs for 16 years/170k miles with minimal issues beyond a power steering pump.
2nd generation (2014–2019)
2014–2019
Compromised
Multiple reports of excessive oil burning starting around 80k miles, engine failures, and piston ring issues. 2016–2018 models particularly affected. Users report needing oil top-ups every 1–2 weeks and engines failing despite regular maintenance.
3rd generation (2020–2025)
2020–2025
Solid
Redesigned 2020 model praised by MotorTrend as 'best-in-class' and Car of the Year finalist. However, oil burning issues persist in some units despite being 'non-affected' VINs. Final model year is 2025. Strong features and build quality, but engine reliability concerns remain.
−
Common complaints6 issues−Systematic engine failure pattern in 2015-2020 models: excessive oil consumption, piston ring failure, catastrophic engine seizure between 60k-120k miles, multiple independent reports of same failure mode
−No all-wheel drive option available, limiting appeal in snow-belt markets
−Mediocre fuel economy compared to competitors (expert sources note underperformance vs. segment)
−High theft risk due to lack of immobilizer on pre-2023 models, multiple theft reports in dataset
−Automatic transmission models show higher failure rates than manual versions
−Stiff accelerator pedal noted by multiple owners, particularly problematic for delivery/rideshare drivers
✓
What owners praise6 strengths✓
Exceptional interior cargo space for its compact footprint, owners consistently praise versatility for hauling gear, musical instruments, camping equipment
✓
Quirky, distinctive styling that owners either love or tolerate, strong aesthetic identity in segment
✓
Generous standard features and good value proposition at MSRP (expert sources note strong equipment levels)
✓
Surprisingly capable on dirt roads and light off-road use despite FWD-only configuration
✓
Manual transmission models (where available) show better reliability and owner satisfaction
✓
Practical daily driver with good visibility and easy parking in tight urban spaces
📊 How this score was calculated — 6-dimension rubric
High confidence▼
219 sources analysed with long-term owner data present
219 sources analysed — strong data quality
Reliability & Durability(22%)3.1
8 positive vs 18 negative long-term reports
User Sentiment(22%)6.2
312 positive upvotes vs 189 negative upvotes
Complaint Severity(16%)6.4
Complaints: 12 cosmetic, 34 functional, 27 systematic, 2 safety
Consensus Strength(8%)2.1
Opinion is use-case dependent — product divides opinion by intended use
Value for Money(15%)5.1
9 'worth it', 3 'overpriced', 8 mention better-value alternatives
Owner Advocacy(17%)4.1
3 repurchased/gifted, 6 unprompted recommendations, 11 regrets
⚠ Systematic failure pattern reported by multiple independent owners
Scores are percentile ranks: 5.0 is the median product in existence. 8.5+ is reserved for genuinely exceptional products (top ~10%). The score reflects consensus quality, what owners say about the product. Risk is tracked separately and shown above the summary when present. Both are calculated deterministically, so the same signals always produce the same score.
Specifications2025
▼Pricing
Starting MSRP
$21,935
Range
$21,935 - $26,965
Capability
Fuel economy
27-29 city / 33-35 hwy MPG
Drivetrain
FWD only
Dimensions & capacity
Seating
5 passengers
Cargo
24.2 cu ft (seats up) / 62.1 cu ft (seats down)
Powertrains
2.0L I-4
standard on all trims
147 hp · 132 lb-ft
Trim pricing
LX
base model, 8.0-inch touchscreen
$21,935
S
16-inch alloy wheels, keyless entry, 10.3-inch touchscreen, wireless charging
$24,000
GT-Line
sporty cosmetic touches, body-color trim
$25,000
EX
top trim with convenience features
$26,000
Soulmate Edition
new for 2025, two-tone paint, Harman/Kardon audio, 18-inch wheels, based on EX
—
🏆
How it ranks in Subcompact Crossover SUV
10 products compared
1
Mazda CX-30
8.8/10
✓ Buy
2
Toyota Corolla Cross
8.4/10
✓ Buy
3
Kia Seltos
8.3/10
✓ Buy
4
Volkswagen Taos
8.3/10
✓ Buy
5
Chevrolet Trax
7.8/10
→ Consider
6
Nissan Kicks
7.6/10
→ Consider
7
Ford Bronco Sport
7.3/10
→ Consider
8
Honda HR-V
7.2/10
→ Consider
9
Hyundai Kona
7.2/10
→ Consider
10
Nissan Versa
7.2/10
→ Consider
If you're buying
Know what others paid before you walk in.